![]() See git help diff, in the section COMBINED DIFF FORMAT. The stash stores both the changes to the working directory that were staged, and the changes that were not staged. The diff program can show you differences between more than two files, in which case multiple columns of "+" and "-" are used. Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/test/.git/ ++ and -) if the thing you're show'ing is a stash? It looks like this: diff -cc test.txt To get changes from only a single commit/stash, have a look at git cherry-pick -no-commit.Why does git show use two + or - symbols (i.e. Note that this is like diff, and offers to apply all differences between the branches. Replace 0 with the stash number from git stash list, if you have more than one. Or omit patch (but not the path) to get all changes to a single file. You may omit the file spec if you want to patch in many parts. Previous solution: There is an easy way to get changes from any branch, including stashes: $ git checkout -patch path/to/file If your distro doesn't have wiggle, you can just build it: cd /usr/local/src/ ![]() This will either resolve the conflict, or give you conflict markers that you'd get from a merge. rej files can then be applied using wiggle, like so: wiggle -replace path/to/relevant/file/in/stash.ext rej files where there are conflicts it can't resolve. If applying the patch/diff fails, you can change the last command to git apply -reject which makes all the changes it can, and leaves. You can edit the stash^! to be any commit range that has the cumulative changes you want (but check over the output of the diff first). then open the patch file in a text editor, alter as required, then do git apply < my.patchĬambunctious's answer bypasses the interactivity by piping one command directly to the other, which is fine if you know you want all changes from the stash. To do it interactively, you would first do git diff stash^! - path/to/relevant/file/in/stash.ext perhaps/another/file.ext > my.patch ![]() This makes the operation additive, with much less chance of undoing work done since the stash was created. use or See cambunctious's answer, which is basically what I now prefer because it only uses the changes in the stash, rather than comparing them to your current state. ( note that here is full pathname of a file relative to top directory of a project (think: relative to might need to protect from shell expansion, i.e. Or to save it under another filename: $ git show > Likewise, you can use git checkout to check a single file out of the stash: $ git checkout. Should also work (see git rev-parse manpage for explanation of rev^! syntax, in "Specifying ranges" section). We use this form of "git diff" (with two commits) because / refs/stash is a merge commit, and we have to tell git which parent we want to diff against. ![]() is first / topmost stash) as a merge commit, and use: $ git diff - Įxplanation: means the first parent of the given stash, which as stated in the explanation above is the commit at which changes were stashed away. Working directory, and its first parent is the commit at HEAD when the On the git stash manpage you can read (in the "Discussion" section, just after "Options" description) that:Ī stash is represented as a commit whose tree records the state of the ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |